# \[DONE\] Ability to hide some databases from search/Entity # Link by default

**URL:** <https://community.fibery.io/t/done-ability-to-hide-some-databases-from-search-entity-link-by-default/4442>\
**Category:** Ideas & Features\
**Tags:** search\
**Created:** [May 13, 2023, 1:39am UTC](https://community.fibery.io/t/done-ability-to-hide-some-databases-from-search-entity-link-by-default/4442 "2023-05-13T01:39:54Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 15

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![cannibalflea](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/community.fibery.io/cannibalflea/32/318_2.png) [@cannibalflea](https://community.fibery.io/u/cannibalflea)\
**Post date:** [December 8, 2023, 11:00pm UTC](https://community.fibery.io/t/done-ability-to-hide-some-databases-from-search-entity-link-by-default/4442/15 "2023-12-08T23:00:14Z")

</div>

Thanks @Chr1sG . I had one more questions: does hiding databases from search affect API queries? The items that I want to hide the most are written and updated through the graphQL API and so as long as that side is unaffected, I think this might work out for me.

> [@cannibalflea](#):
>
> It would be great to have a bit more granular control on where the records appear (in global search, entity references …)

I find the access templates interface to be a really great prototype for how search could be customized developing on the function:

> [@Dec 7, 2023 / christmas\_tree Find References in text using AI, Custom access templates, Add many entities to Whiteboard](https://community.fibery.io/t/dec-7-2023-find-references-in-text-using-ai-custom-access-templates-add-many-entities-to-whiteboard/5500/1):
>
> ![image (1)](https://us1.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/uploads/fibery/original/2X/2/2bad5135b6a3aae555924fa5f382d174acb6919a.png)
> 
> image (1)2144×976 144 KB

---

_[View the full topic](https://community.fibery.io/t/done-ability-to-hide-some-databases-from-search-entity-link-by-default/4442)._