# Discourse Integration - Vote Counts

**URL:** <https://community.fibery.io/t/discourse-integration-vote-counts/4581>\
**Category:** Integrations\
**Created:** [June 9, 2023, 3:31am UTC](https://community.fibery.io/t/discourse-integration-vote-counts/4581 "2023-06-09T03:31:42Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Yuri\_BC](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/community.fibery.io/yuri_bc/32/8803_2.png) [@Yuri\_BC](https://community.fibery.io/u/Yuri_BC)\
**Post date:** [August 22, 2023, 4:11pm UTC](https://community.fibery.io/t/discourse-integration-vote-counts/4581/2 "2023-08-22T16:11:56Z")

</div>

Related, which may align well with Discourse integration

> [@Rating Widget field type (showing total and average of individual ratings), e.g. Star rating, Thumbs up/down, Likes, etc](https://community.fibery.io/t/rating-widget-field-type-showing-total-and-average-of-individual-ratings-e-g-star-rating-thumbs-up-down-likes-etc/4983):
>
> Current User Experience Tensions and Limitations: In the existing Fibery setup, while we have powerful tools to capture and organize information, there’s a noticeable gap in capturing granular feedback. Single select fields, while useful, can only store one value at a time, making it challenging to aggregate feedback from multiple users or compute averages. This limitation hinders our ability to provide a holistic view of user sentiment, especially for project teams aiming to collect and analyze…

---

_[View the full topic](https://community.fibery.io/t/discourse-integration-vote-counts/4581)._
