# Bi-directional integrations/sync

**URL:** <https://community.fibery.io/t/bi-directional-integrations-sync/1691>\
**Category:** Integrations\
**Created:** [June 7, 2021, 9:39pm UTC](https://community.fibery.io/t/bi-directional-integrations-sync/1691 "2021-06-07T21:39:46Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 77

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Tommy\_Hedley](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/community.fibery.io/tommy_hedley/32/6468_2.png) [@Tommy\_Hedley](https://community.fibery.io/u/Tommy_Hedley)\
**Post date:** [November 1, 2026, 3:10am UTC](https://community.fibery.io/t/bi-directional-integrations-sync/1691/77 "2026-11-01T03:10:39Z")

</div>

Well, not to be discouraged, I spent some time developing my previous request and testing into two feature requests. I think the described features would make it more straightforward for us to create robust bi-directional syncs. Please let me know what you think:

[Custom Integrations Improvement 1 - Officially support writable fields](https://community.fibery.io/t/custom-integrations-improvement-1-officially-support-writable-fields/11482)

[Custom Integrations Improvement 2 - Allow creates and emit posts for creates and deletes](https://community.fibery.io/t/custom-integrations-improvement-2-allow-creates-and-emit-posts-for-creates-and-deletes/11483)

---

_[View the full topic](https://community.fibery.io/t/bi-directional-integrations-sync/1691)._
