# \[APPROVED\] Polymorphic relations. When creating relation, ability to have many Types from which to choose, and not just one Type

**URL:** <https://community.fibery.io/t/approved-polymorphic-relations-when-creating-relation-ability-to-have-many-types-from-which-to-choose-and-not-just-one-type/425>\
**Category:** Ideas & Features\
**Tags:** flexible-domain\
**Created:** [November 22, 2019, 12:14am UTC](https://community.fibery.io/t/approved-polymorphic-relations-when-creating-relation-ability-to-have-many-types-from-which-to-choose-and-not-just-one-type/425 "2019-11-22T00:14:24Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 57

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![mdubakov](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/community.fibery.io/mdubakov/32/10_2.png) [@mdubakov](https://community.fibery.io/u/mdubakov)\
**Post date:** [September 27, 2023, 7:08am UTC](https://community.fibery.io/t/approved-polymorphic-relations-when-creating-relation-ability-to-have-many-types-from-which-to-choose-and-not-just-one-type/425/57 "2023-09-27T07:08:58Z")

</div>

It appeared we need Polymorphic relations for References 2.0 features. So there is a chance that we will add them this year. However, with some limitations (like up to 5 databases on every end).

---

_[View the full topic](https://community.fibery.io/t/approved-polymorphic-relations-when-creating-relation-ability-to-have-many-types-from-which-to-choose-and-not-just-one-type/425)._
