# Anytype — Interesting app concept for PKM and teamwork **URL:** https://community.fibery.io/t/anytype-interesting-app-concept-for-pkm-and-teamwork/2085 **Category:** Second Brain for Teams **Created:** [October 1, 2021, 7:12pm UTC](https://community.fibery.io/t/anytype-interesting-app-concept-for-pkm-and-teamwork/2085 "2021-10-01T19:12:44Z") **Posts on this page:** 1 **Showing post:** 36
### Author: ![Yuri\_BC](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/community.fibery.io/yuri_bc/32/8803_2.png) [@Yuri\_BC](https://community.fibery.io/u/Yuri_BC) #### Post date: [July 10, 2023, 11:01am UTC](https://community.fibery.io/t/anytype-interesting-app-concept-for-pkm-and-teamwork/2085/36 "2023-07-10T11:01:52Z")
I think AnyType is a good case study to keep tracking, because it reflects as new initiative probably the most insteresting developments in the field of decentralized peer to peer collaboration. The challenge for Fibery is to reassess its business model, whether and how to jump this boat or not, it depends of the vision and experience of the founders. This aligns with my suggestion about semi-decentralized connectivity of Fibery spaces: > [@Towards (semi) decentralized cross-workspaces collaboration and sharing of databases](https://community.fibery.io/t/towards-semi-decentralized-cross-workspaces-collaboration-and-sharing-of-databases/4572): > > Working with many collaboration initiatives and networks, I often experience the limitations of tools that are mainly built to serve classic organizations, not (semi)decentralized collaboration networks. I see that the trend is now towards such more (semi)decentralized collaboration tools. Please let me know your ideas and comments, when you read this. I asked GPT-4 (with Bing browser extension) this question: Please analyze the architecture of the application [fibery.io](http://fibery.io) and propose how we can… --- _[View the full topic](https://community.fibery.io/t/anytype-interesting-app-concept-for-pkm-and-teamwork/2085)._