# Anytype — Interesting app concept for PKM and teamwork **URL:** \ **Category:** Second Brain for Teams\ **Created:** [October 1, 2021, 7:12pm UTC](https://community.fibery.io/t/anytype-interesting-app-concept-for-pkm-and-teamwork/2085 "2021-10-01T19:12:44Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 1\ **Showing post:** 10
**Author:** ![Chr1sG](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/community.fibery.io/chr1sg/32/3941_2.png) [@Chr1sG](https://community.fibery.io/u/Chr1sG)\ **Post date:** [October 7, 2021, 9:33am UTC](https://community.fibery.io/t/anytype-interesting-app-concept-for-pkm-and-teamwork/2085/10 "2021-10-07T09:33:41Z")
Well I know that adding attributes to relations is one of the more popular requests for Fibery, so in that instance I’ll give Anytype thumbs up! > [@Relationship properties](https://community.fibery.io/t/relationship-properties/887): > > This might be a big ask, but would it be possible to add properties to relationships as well as entities (like is possible with a graph database)? I realise that the more sophisticated you make the underlying platform, the greater the risk of users being scared away by the complexity, but for me, it would put you into a whole different league. It could be a feature that can be enabled but is disabled by default so as to not scare non-techies… --- _[View the full topic](https://community.fibery.io/t/anytype-interesting-app-concept-for-pkm-and-teamwork/2085)._