# Airtable vs. Fibery in how features and functionality are framed and communicated

**URL:** <https://community.fibery.io/t/airtable-vs-fibery-in-how-features-and-functionality-are-framed-and-communicated/3412>\
**Category:** Second Brain for Teams\
**Created:** [October 18, 2022, 7:25pm UTC](https://community.fibery.io/t/airtable-vs-fibery-in-how-features-and-functionality-are-framed-and-communicated/3412 "2022-10-18T19:25:12Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Dimitri\_S](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/community.fibery.io/dimitri_s/32/1683_2.png) [@Dimitri\_S](https://community.fibery.io/u/Dimitri_S)\
**Post date:** [October 24, 2022, 7:12pm UTC](https://community.fibery.io/t/airtable-vs-fibery-in-how-features-and-functionality-are-framed-and-communicated/3412/2 "2022-10-24T19:12:26Z")

</div>

I started with Airtable back in late 2020 but got the feeling that development appeared to have stalled and the lack of critical features like comprehensive permissions controls and two-way sync between bases led me to look for something else which ended up being Fibery.

Not sure what happened but mid-2021 Airtable started cranking out incredible feature releases. Most of which Fibery already had in one way or another. But yes [the way they sold every months feature release](https://blog.airtable.com/whats-new-in-airtable-july-2021/) made it seem like it was a game changer. I’m kind of surprised that Fibery doesn’t package their feature releases into emails - maybe they do and I’m unsubscribed?

That being said, Airtable’s Interface Designer is the one thing that’s giving me major FOMO  
I would even be made content just by getting something like Coda’s “Customize view” (see below)

> [@Individual Layouts for a node, hide fields etc](https://community.fibery.io/t/individual-layouts-for-a-node-hide-fields-etc/995/53):
>
> Bumping this for additional consideration since I see its on the “NEXT: Consider for near future (1-2 months)” in the current version of the roadmap. Specifically, I would love to see something like Coda’s “Customize view” as shown in the [Fibery vs. Coda. The Power of Workarounds](https://fibery.io/blog/fibery-vs-coda-the-power-of-workarounds/) post. [asset-5]

---

_[View the full topic](https://community.fibery.io/t/airtable-vs-fibery-in-how-features-and-functionality-are-framed-and-communicated/3412)._