# Add a view of "Collection" entities within another entity that are not related, just for reference **URL:** \ **Category:** Ideas & Features\ **Created:** [February 22, 2020, 10:36pm UTC](https://community.fibery.io/t/add-a-view-of-collection-entities-within-another-entity-that-are-not-related-just-for-reference/568 "2020-02-22T22:36:08Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 1\ **Showing post:** 1
**Author:** ![B\_Sp](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/e8c25b/32.png) [@B\_Sp](https://community.fibery.io/u/B_Sp)\ **Post date:** [February 22, 2020, 10:36pm UTC](https://community.fibery.io/t/add-a-view-of-collection-entities-within-another-entity-that-are-not-related-just-for-reference/568/1 "2020-02-22T22:36:08Z")
Hello again! I agree that Fibery is a much simpler tool to configure and set up than both Notion and Coda. One of the great features are the easy-to-set up relations between entities. You guys have great views as well with your “connections” features between many-to-many relations: ![Untitled](https://us1.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/uploads/fibery/original/2X/e/e433ece9518f374e929b176868bcd53186b5850f.png) I was remarking that in Notion, the best way to duplicate this view is with an embedded db. There are a lot of benefits to that view. However, those are not related entities. So I thought if you could give a user the option to add into connections here, where you select which fields to display from another Type: ![image](https://us1.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/uploads/fibery/original/2X/b/ba0776966ab4fdc4f413cc4c486da2426e588f2c.png) but have these entities _not_ automatically relate, you’d pick up this functionality. However, the default relation is of course very key. So you’d have a significant improved feature over Notion (and Coda which also only relate, but don’t show just a view - so opposite of Notion). Hope that’s useful, thanks guys! --- _[View the full topic](https://community.fibery.io/t/add-a-view-of-collection-entities-within-another-entity-that-are-not-related-just-for-reference/568)._