# 2FA Authentication?

**URL:** <https://community.fibery.io/t/2fa-authentication/1607>\
**Category:** Ideas & Features\
**Created:** [May 7, 2021, 8:54pm UTC](https://community.fibery.io/t/2fa-authentication/1607 "2021-05-07T20:54:58Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 5\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Chr1sG](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/community.fibery.io/chr1sg/32/3941_2.png) [@Chr1sG](https://community.fibery.io/u/Chr1sG)\
**Post date:** [May 7, 2021, 8:54pm UTC](https://community.fibery.io/t/2fa-authentication/1607/1 "2021-05-07T20:54:58Z")

</div>

Any chance of adding 2FA to Fibery?  
I think I saw Okta in the WIP - might this include 2FA or other authentication features?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![antoniokov](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/community.fibery.io/antoniokov/32/201_2.png) [@antoniokov](https://community.fibery.io/u/antoniokov)\
**Post date:** [May 11, 2021, 9:53am UTC](https://community.fibery.io/t/2fa-authentication/1607/3 "2021-05-11T09:53:05Z")

</div>

SAML SSO support (including Okta) is indeed a work in progress.

As a nice side effect, we’ll add an option to enable/disable authentication methods per workspace. So you’ll be free to turn off email and Microsoft auth leaving only Google active, for example. Turn on 2FA in your Google org – and you’ll have de-facto 2FA in Fibery.

This is not a native 2FA but we hope it’s a start 🙂

@Chr1sG, do you think this would work for you?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Chr1sG](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/community.fibery.io/chr1sg/32/3941_2.png) [@Chr1sG](https://community.fibery.io/u/Chr1sG)\
**Post date:** [May 11, 2021, 10:08am UTC](https://community.fibery.io/t/2fa-authentication/1607/4 "2021-05-11T10:08:15Z")

</div>

We don’t use Google for our email hosting, so I guess we’d have to migrate for that to work for us.  
(or we could ask people to set up a shadow Google email address just for logging into Fibery, but that might make notifications sub-optimal).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![antoniokov](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/community.fibery.io/antoniokov/32/201_2.png) [@antoniokov](https://community.fibery.io/u/antoniokov)\
**Post date:** [May 11, 2021, 10:29am UTC](https://community.fibery.io/t/2fa-authentication/1607/5 "2021-05-11T10:29:32Z")

</div>

Hm, that doesn’t sound good…  
Unfortunately, a native 2FA is certainly out of the scope of the current feature. But we’ll continue to collect cases with self-hosted email + no SAML SSO + 2FA desired. If the demand is there, we’ll add the native 2FA.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Chr1sG](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/community.fibery.io/chr1sg/32/3941_2.png) [@Chr1sG](https://community.fibery.io/u/Chr1sG)\
**Post date:** [May 11, 2021, 10:41am UTC](https://community.fibery.io/t/2fa-authentication/1607/6 "2021-05-11T10:41:42Z")

</div>

Fair enough. I just wasn’t sure what the Okta stuff was all about - I’d never heard of it before.  
Just FYI, we are probably more likely to migrate to O365 for our email hosting than to Google - is it possible/likely that 2FA could be added to the Microsoft login method?
